Legal Opinion

Prowell v. Brittingham

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided May 19, 1958No. Equity Docket, no. 2264Published

1Opinion of the Court

Herman, J.,

— This case comes before us by way of preliminary objections of the additional *199defendant to the original defendants’ complaint against him.

The additional defendant avers in his preliminary objections that defendants’ complaint fails to state a cause of action against him for which relief can be granted, that defendants have a full, complete and adequate nonstatutory remedy at law against him and that he has been improperly joined as an additional defendant because he is neither alone liable, nor liable over to defendants, nor jointly or severally liable with defendants on the cause…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Vinnacombe v. Phila. Am. S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Gray v. Phila. & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Rau v. MankoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Tucker v. BinenstockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Pearl Assurance Co. v. National Insurance Agency, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API