Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Binenstock

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1932No. Appeal, 300PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

Tucker and Binenstoek, the parties to this suit, with four others, organized in 1923 the New Century Realty Company. The purpose of the corporation, as outlined in its charter, was dealing in real estate, but its real purpose was the purchase of a brewery, and it did purchase the property operated by the Class & Nachod Company, a brewing concern. To further their plain, the Atlantic Brewing Company, another corporation, was formed. It leased this property from the New Century Company. The Atlantic Company was to operate the brewery in manufacturing near beer. The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. United States v. Milwaukee Refrigerator Transit Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1905
  3. Callery's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Premier Cereal & Beverage Co. v. Pennsylvania Alcohol Permit BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Vandegrift v. VandegriftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Zubik v. ZubikCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  2. Revere Press, Inc. v. BLUMBERGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Barium Steel Corp. v. WileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Hastings Associates, Inc. v. Local 369 Building Fund, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  5. Pearl Assurance Co. v. National Insurance Agency, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API