Pearl Assurance Co. v. National Insurance Agency, Inc.

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

This action of trespass was before us in 150 Pa. Superior Ct. 265, 28 A. 2d 334. We ordered a re-argument because the theory on which we were inclined to decide the case had not been raised or argued, and we thought it only fair to the litigants, as well as to this court, that we should have the benefit of the argument of counsel before making our decision. That argument has now been had, and we are confirmed in our opinion that the judgments should be affirmed.

We shall not repeat the facts recited in our prior opinion. Reference may be had to it. The gist of the…