Legal Opinion

Ramos v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 6, 1993No. 331-92PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

McCORMICK, Presiding Judge.

A jury convicted appellant of aggravated sexual assault and assessed punishment at confinement for fifty years. See Y.T.C.A., Penal Code, Section 22.021. The Fort Worth Court of Appeals reversed the conviction, holding the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of sexual assault. Ramos v. State, 821 S.W.2d 418 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1991); see V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Section 22.011. We granted petitions for discretionary review filed by the Tarrant County District Attorney and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Royster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Godsey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Arcila v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Ramos v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  3. Welch v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  4. Enriquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API