Legal Opinion

Arcila v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 24, 1992No. 382-90PublishedCited by 148 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

BENAVIDES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of possessing cocaine and sentenced to 35 years of confinement in the penitentiary and a fine of $1,000. On direct appeal, he urged reversal of the conviction for failure of the trial court to suppress the physical evidence seized from his residence, claiming that his consent to search, given only after he had been illegally arrested, was not voluntary. The Fifth Court of Appeals agreed that appellant’s arrest was illegal under Texas law, but concluded that seizure of the cocaine was not unlawful…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Meraz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. McCullough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Juarez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by148 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Rankin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  3. Bauder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Delrio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API