Legal Opinion

Royster v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 23, 1981No. 60161PublishedCited by 714 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*443OPINION

DALLY, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of robbery. The punishment, enhanced by two prior felony convictions, is imprisonment for life.

The appellant asserts that: (1) the trial court erred in overruling his motion to quash the indictment which he says does not allege the offense in plain and intelligible language; (2) in overruling his motion to quash the enhancement paragraphs of the indictment; (3) in refusing to submit requested charges for lesser included offenses; (4) in overruling his objection to his in-court identification; and (5) in overruling his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sansone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Berra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Hollins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by714 opinions

  1. Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Bignall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Feldman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

709 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API