Legal Opinion

Enriquez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 21, 2000No. 724-99PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · McCORMICKMcCORMICK, P.J.

in which MANSFIELD, KELLER, HOLLAND, WOMACK and KEASLER, JJ„ joined.

A jury convicted appellant of delivery of between 50 and 2,000 pounds of marijuana which was packaged in 105 separate bundles. In a 2-1 decision the Court of Appeals decided appellant was entitled to a lesser-included offense jury instruction on delivery of more than 5 but less than 50 pounds of marijuana. Enriquez v. State, 988 S.W.2d 899, 902-03 (TexApp.-Houston [14 th Dist] 1999.

This case concerns the application of the second prong of the test for when a defendant is entitled to a lesser-included offense jury…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Skinner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Ramos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Enriquez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999

4Cited by72 opinions

  1. Bullock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  3. Ritcherson, Kaitlyn LucretiaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
  4. Paz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  5. Harold L. Graves, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2014

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API