Enriquez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · McCORMICKMcCORMICK, P.J.
in which MANSFIELD, KELLER, HOLLAND, WOMACK and KEASLER, JJ„ joined.
A jury convicted appellant of delivery of between 50 and 2,000 pounds of marijuana which was packaged in 105 separate bundles. In a 2-1 decision the Court of Appeals decided appellant was entitled to a lesser-included offense jury instruction on delivery of more than 5 but less than 50 pounds of marijuana. Enriquez v. State, 988 S.W.2d 899, 902-03 (TexApp.-Houston [14 th Dist] 1999.
This case concerns the application of the second prong of the test for when a defendant is entitled to a lesser-included offense jury…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Skinner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Ramos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Enriquez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
4Cited by72 opinions
- Bullock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Ritcherson, Kaitlyn LucretiaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Paz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- Harold L. Graves, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2014
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.