Legal Opinion

Kaufman v. ACS Systems, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 22, 2003No. B155804, B156082PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MALLANO, J.

In this appeal we determine the applicability and constitutionality of a federal statute that restricts unsolicited facsimile (fax) advertisements, commonly called “junk fax.” The federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA or Act) (Pub.L. No. 102-243, § 3(a) (Dec. 20, 1991) 105 Stat. 2395) prohibits the sending of unsolicited advertisements to fax machines. Anyone receiving such a fax may, “if otherwise permitted by the laws or rules of court of a State, bring in an appropriate court of that State ... [(K] ... an action [seeking injunctive relief and actual…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Maynard v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Klein v. City of San ClementeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Carnett's, Inc. v. HammondSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  4. Terra Nova Insurance v. Fray-WitzerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  5. R.A. Ponte Architects, Ltd. v. Investors' Alert, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API