Legal Opinion

Bierman v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 10, 1966No. 1 CA-IC 77PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Judge.

This is a writ of certiorari to review the lawfulness of an award of the Industrial Commission of Arizona.

We are called upon to determine whether there is sufficient evidence upon which the Commission may reopen a plaim for compensation.

On 5 April, 1956, petitioner suffered severe industrial injuries including contusions to the lower back, contusions to the spinal cord, and factures of ribs and vertebrae. After an extended period of medical treatment, including surgery, the Commission found that petitioner had suffered a 45% general functional disability and a 23.7% loss in his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Murray v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Adkins v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Steward v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Camis v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  2. Meadows v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  3. Salmi v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. Borsh v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Padilla v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API