Borsh v. Industrial Commission of Arizona
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Justice.
We granted Joseph A. Borsh’s petition for review of a decision and opinion of the Court of Appeals, Division One, affirming the Industrial Commission’s award of scheduled benefits under A.R.S. § 23-1044(B)(21). We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.24, Rule 23, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S., and Rule 8(b), Rules of Procedure for Special Actions, 17A A.R.S.
We must answer the following questions on appeal:
1. Was there a presumption that petitioner’s previous non-industrially related physical disability was an earning capacity disability which…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hoffman v. BrophyArizona Supreme Court · 1944
- Ronquillo v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Alsbrooks v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Savich v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Wollum v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Pullins v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Adams Insulation Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Asbestos Engineering & Supply Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Kovacs v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.