Legal Opinion

Borsh v. Industrial Commission of Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1980No. 15046-PRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

We granted Joseph A. Borsh’s petition for review of a decision and opinion of the Court of Appeals, Division One, affirming the Industrial Commission’s award of scheduled benefits under A.R.S. § 23-1044(B)(21). We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.24, Rule 23, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S., and Rule 8(b), Rules of Procedure for Special Actions, 17A A.R.S.

We must answer the following questions on appeal:

1. Was there a presumption that petitioner’s previous non-industrially related physical disability was an earning capacity disability which…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. BrophyArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Ronquillo v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Alsbrooks v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Savich v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Wollum v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Pullins v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Adams Insulation Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Asbestos Engineering & Supply Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. Kovacs v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API