Salmi v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
STEVENS, Chief Judge.
This matter presents the dual question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support an Award which is not favorable to the petitioner, and the claim that the referee who conducted the formal hearing departed from his duty of impartiality.
When the services of referees were first utilized in conducting hearings, the referees were members of the legal staff of the Industrial Commission and generally there was no separate person who appeared as the attorney for the fund. Under these circumstances it was at times difficult for a referee to put aside his natural feeling of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- Lewis v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Womack v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Bierman v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Quirk v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
3Cited by13 opinions
- Arellano v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Ohlmaier v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Camis v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- German v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Parkway Manufacturing v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.