Legal Opinion

Camis v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 25, 1966No. 1 CA-IC 90PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Judge.

This is a writ of certiorari to review the lawfulness of an award of the Industrial Commission of Arizona.

The Commission determined that petitioner had suffered a permanent partial disability equal to a 50% loss of function of the right (major) arm, and was entitled to a scheduled award as provided by 23-1044 A.R.S. Petitioner asks this Court to declare that the Commission is required, when a disability may be classified under either of two alternative scheduled disability provisions, to make the award which is of greater monetary benefit to the petitioner.

The facts necessary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morris v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Williams v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Bierman v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. Salmi v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Nye v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jacks v. Banister Pipelines AmericaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  2. Bernard v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  3. Lang Pham v. Delta Petroleum Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Padilla v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API