Legal Opinion
Padilla v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 10, 1975No. 1 CA-IC 1136PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NELSON, Presiding Judge.
This appeal presents the following question : where both parents are employed, and pool their incomes to support their household and their children, and one parent is industrially injured and on total temporary disability status, is he or she entitled to the $10.00 per month dependency allowance provided by our Workmen’s Compensation Statutes (A.R.S. § 23-1045.A.2) ?
Petitioner, Maria Padilla (Padilla), was injured on May 13, 1973. Respondent carrier accepted her claim for workmen’s compensation benefits and determined her average monthly wage to be $393.28.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Weinberger v. WiesenfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Selective Life Insurance v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- In Re Estate of HenryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Jim's Water Service v. EayrsWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Padilla v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Tomarchio v. Township of GreenwichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- El Dorado Insurance Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.