Legal Opinion

Boyd v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided June 26, 2009No. A-10058PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOLGER, Judge.

David T. Boyd was convicted of operating an oversized vehicle on the state highway system without a permit. 1 He contends that the district court erred when it concluded that the permit requirements of 17 AAC 25.011 applied to the road grader he was operating. For the reasons explained here, we affirm the district court's decision.

Background facts and proceedings

On August 20, 2007, Boyd was operating a road grader on the Palmer-Wasilla highway. A commercial vehicle enforcement officer stopped Boyd to determine if the road grader was oversized, and, if so, whether Boyd had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State, Department of Highways v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Peninsula Marketing Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Millman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992
  4. Wilson v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2006

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harvey v. State, Department of TransportationWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State, Office of Public Advocacy, Office of Elder Fraud & Assistance v. Estate of Jean R.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Tweedy v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough Board of Adjustment and AppealsAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Dickie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2012
  5. Tweedy v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough Board of Adjustment and AppealsAlaska Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API