Legal Opinion
Harvey v. State, Department of Transportation
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided April 25, 2011No. S-10-0194PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURKE, Justice.
[T1] Appellant, Ronald Harvey, challenges an order from the district court affirming the suspension of his driver's Heense under Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 81-6-102 (Lexis-Nexis 2009). 1 Appellant contends the trooper who stopped him did not have probable cause to justify the stop. We affirm.
ISSUE
[¶2] Mr. Harvey presents the following issue:
Did the arresting officer present sufficient facts to find that Mr. Harvey violated the elements of Wyoming's Implied Consent law, specifically that the officer presented sufficient "admissible" evidence to support that he observed a valid violation…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Dale v. S & S Builders, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. Metamora Water Service, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Saldana v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Spreeman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Gibson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- Tiernan v. State, Department of TransportationWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- Orchard v. State, Department of TransportationWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.