Legal Opinion

Moore v. New Amsterdam Casualty Insurance Company

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided September 22, 1961No. Civ. A. 3578PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DARR, District Judge.

For a number of years Mr. J. Nat Moore, Jr., operated a large hardware and furniture store in Athens, Tennessee. He did business under the trade name of J. Nat Moore & Son. On December 27, 1959, his storehouse burned to the ground, consuming all the contents.

At that time, Mr. Moore held a fire insurance policy with the New Amsterdam Casualty Insurance Company (hereafter' New Amsterdam) for protection on the building in the sum of $40,000, and a like policy with the Continental Insurance Company (hereafter Continental) in the sum of $40,000. He also held a fire insurance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. DeFord v. National Life & Accident Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Beasley v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  3. De Rossett Hat Co. v. London Lancashire Fire Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. KirkpatrickTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Cheek v. American Eagle Fire Ins.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Roth v. LugoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
  2. Forbes Company v. MacNeelWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. CondictDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1976
  4. Royal Insurance Co. v. Alliance Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  5. State v. ClementsTennessee Supreme Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API