Legal Opinion

Timmons v. Reed

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1977No. 4681PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Justice.

This appeal concerns the propriety of entering a summary judgment against appellant-plaintiff in his tort and nuisance action for damages arising out of a rear-end collision, which involved two trucks on a fog-covered highway near Byron, Wyoming. Defendants, James Henry Reed and NEPE-CO Company (hereinafter referred to as “Reed”), and defendant, Marathon Oil Company, moved for and were granted summary judgments on the grounds that there was no disputed issue of material fact, and that plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law for failure to comply with the…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SoulisWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Jacobs v. JacobsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  3. Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Bluejacket v. CarneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Murphy v. HawthorneOregon Supreme Court · 1926

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Bober v. New Mexico State FairNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Greenwood v. WierdsmaWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Bancroft v. JaguschWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Laird v. LairdWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Kimbley v. City of Green RiverWyoming Supreme Court · 1982

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API