Krzeminski v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This military pay case is presently before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment and on plaintiff’s cross-motion for partial summary judgment. Upon consideration of the written and oral submissions of the parties and for reasons set out below, defendant’s motion is denied and plaintiff’s motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
The court notes at the outset that this is not the typical military pay case in which the Claims Court is reviewing a decision of a military records correction board. The plaintiff, Michael Krzeminski, was…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Nickerson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Wyatt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Marathon Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Spalding & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.