Legal Opinion

Krzeminski v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 2, 1987No. 348-86CPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

This military pay case is presently before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment and on plaintiff’s cross-motion for partial summary judgment. Upon consideration of the written and oral submissions of the parties and for reasons set out below, defendant’s motion is denied and plaintiff’s motion is granted.

BACKGROUND

The court notes at the outset that this is not the typical military pay case in which the Claims Court is reviewing a decision of a military records correction board. The plaintiff, Michael Krzeminski, was…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Nickerson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  2. Wyatt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  3. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  4. Marathon Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  5. Spalding & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API