Legal Opinion

Haas v. Integrity Mutual Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1958PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

Sec. 209.06 (1), Stats. 1955, provided:

“No oral or written statement, representation, or warranty made by the insured or in his behalf in the negotiation of a contract of insurance shall be deemed material or defeat or avoid the policy, unless such statement, representation, or warranty was false and made with intent to deceive, or unless the matter misrepresented or made a warranty increased the risk or contributed to the loss.”

This section does away with the prior distinction between representations and warranties made in the negotiation of a contract of insurance. The legal effect of each…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Olson v. Herman Farmers Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Demirjian v. New York Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Kline v. Washington National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Spray v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Modisette v. Foundation Reserve Insurance Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. MacK Trucks, Inc. v. SundeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Highlands Insurance Company v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Peil v. KohnkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Bade v. Badger Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API