Legal Opinion

Kline v. Washington National Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFeitz, J.

Under date of March 28, 1933-, the defendant issued the policy in suit to plaintiff to insure against loss to *23him as- the result of disability due to accident and sickness. Plaintiff sustained loss within the coverage of the policy by reason of appendicitis, which resulted in disability, and necessitated medical treatment, including an operation. Defendant denied liability on several grounds.(1) Plaintiff falsely answered “No” to a question in the printed application for the policy, which read:

“Have you been disabled by either accident or illness, or received medical or surgical attention…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. F. Dohmen Co. v. Niagara Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Bannon v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Hanf v. Northwestern Masonic Aid Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Meyer v. Home Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Delfosse v. New Franken Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Khadouri Chaachou v. American Central Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  2. Bade v. Badger Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Haas v. Integrity Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Allstate Ins. Co. v. MoldenhauerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
  5. Polley v. Boehck Equipment Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API