Legal Opinion
Bade v. Badger Mutual Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided May 10, 1966PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
On this motion for summary judgment the material facts are not in dispute nor are the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom doubtful.
In McWhorter v. Employers Mut. Casualty Co. (1965), 28 Wis. (2d) 275, 277, 278, 137 N. W. (2d) 49, the court stated:
“The rules governing summary judgments are well known and have been frequently stated and explained by this court. Under the rule of Hyland Hall & Co. v. Madison Gas & Electric Co. (1960), 11 Wis. (2d) 238, 105 N. W. (2d) 305, and Dottai v. Altenbach (1963), 19 Wis. (2d) 373, 120 N. W. (2d) 41, we first examined the moving papers and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hanz Trucking, Inc. v. Harris Brothers Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Voysey v. LabiskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Swedish American National Bank of Minneapolis v. KoebernickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Bond v. HarrelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Kurz v. CollinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Attoe v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Mansfield v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Peil v. KohnkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Sipple v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Kenosha County v. Town of ParisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.