Legal Opinion
Cusick v. Carver
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided April 8, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBernard, J.
Plaintiff John Cusick (“Cusick”) claims that he had an oral agreement with the sellers of real estate which entitled him to a broker’s commission that was never paid. His complaint in this action alleged intentional interference with contractual relations, civil conspiracy and violations of G.L.c. 93A, §11 by the defendant-brokers who handled the real estate’s sale. The trial court allowed the defendants’ Mass. R. Civ. P., Rule 56, motions for summary judgment. Cusick argues on this appeal that the trial court erred in (a) allowing, on November 6, 2002, a motion by defendants DeWolfe New…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- International Fidelity Insurance v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- G.S. Enterprises, Inc. v. Falmouth Marine, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Kurker v. HellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Situation Management Systems, Inc. v. Malouf, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Schulte v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Citibank (South Dakota) NA v. SurabianMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2013
- Doyle v. BaltaksMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007
- Nieves v. MarraquinMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. LaPortaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2015
- Harvard 45 Associates, LLC v. BishayMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2015