Legal Opinion
Nieves v. Marraquin
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided December 8, 2009PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The plaintiffs have appealed the denials of their motions for relief from the dismissals of their claims against two of the defendants, ordered as sanctions for their discovery violations.
On September 18, 2005, plaintiffs Ramon L. Nieves, Igor I. Busanet, Igor A. Busanet, Luz M. Amarat, and Luis A. Perez (collectively, the “Nieves plaintiffs”) and plaintiff Cesar H. Bonilla (“Bonilla”) were pedestrians injured when a vehicle operated by defendant Gustavo A. Marraquin and owned by defendant Oscar R. Barrera (collectively, “Marraquin/Barrera”) collided with a vehicle operated by defendant Jean…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Herbert A. Sullivan, Inc. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Berube v. McKesson Wine & Spirits Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Fabre v. WaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Feltch v. General Rental Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- United Artists Corp. & L.P.A.A., Marcello Danon v. La Cage Aux Folles, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. LaPortaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2015
- Pantos v. ZaroznyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011