Legal Opinion

Harvard 45 Associates, LLC v. Bishay

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided February 3, 2015Published

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, PJ.

The defendants, Bahig F. Bishay and Mary Costello, a/k/a Mary Bishay (together, “Bishay”), appeal from the denial of certain motions, chiefly one “to reopen” the case. We need not analyze overmuch the merits, if any, of this matter because we dismiss, sua sponte, the appeal for lateness and a deficient notice of appeal.

litigation concerning the subject of this action — certain real property in Westwood — began more than 13 years ago, in 2001, with a judgment against Bahig F. Bishay in Brighton District Court The plaintiff here, Harvard 45 Associates, LLC (“Harvard 45”), became…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. L.L., a juvenile v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. Picciotto v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  3. Schulte v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Cullen Enterprises, Inc. v. Massachusetts Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  5. Scannell v. Ed. Ferreirinha & Irmao, Lda.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API