Legal Opinion
Kurker v. Hell
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided January 22, 1998No. 96-P-409PublishedCited by 191 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The plaintiff, George Kurker, filed a ten-count complaint in the Superior Court against numerous defendants, including four attorneys, alleging various causes of action, all arising out of the purchase of the assets of Everhot All-Copper, Inc. (Everhot), a manufacturer of water heaters, by ThermaFlow, Inc. (Therma-Flow), a competitor. Seven of the ten counts asserted claims against the attorneys.2 The essence of the complaint against the attorneys is that the assets sale was at a grossly inadequate price and that the four attorneys, with the other defendants, colluded and conspired to deflate…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- United Truck Leasing Corp. v. GeltmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by191 opinions
- Taylor v. American Chemistry CouncilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Rakes v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Cavicchi v. KoskiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- Thomas v. Town of SalisburyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- Weld v. Glaxo Wellcome Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.