Doyle v. Baltaks
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtCurtin, J.
Plaintiff Robert P. Doyle (“Doyle”) has appealed the allowance of the defendants’ Mass. R. Civ. P., Rule 12(b) (6), motion to dismiss his complaint on the ground of res judicata.
Doyle is the former tenant of defendants William J. and Phyllis Baltaks (the “Baltaks”), who brought a summary process action against him in 2002 to recover unpaid rent and possession of the premises. Doyle filed a counterclaim in the 2002 action alleging that the premises were defective, and that the Baltaks had failed to provide heat, hot water and smoke detectors, had cross-metered the utilities, and had committed…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Heacock v. HeacockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Cousineau v. LarameeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Boyd v. Jamaica Plain Co-Operative BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Pollack v. KellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Bagley v. MoxleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. HoyleMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2014
- Financial Planning Alternatives, Inc. v. De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2012
- Grandoit v. R.J. Leyden, LLCMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2015
- Liquori v. PelleyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010