Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1989No. CV-88-0239-PRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

I. JURISDICTION

Helen Murphy, as guardian ad litem for her husband Kenneth Murphy, filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits. The employer’s insurance carrier denied her claim. After a hearing, the administrative law judge agreed. Claimant appealed to the court of appeals, 157 Ariz. 493, 759 P.2d 639, (App.1988), which affirmed the administrative law judge. We granted claimant’s petition for review. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3), A.R.S. §§ 12-120.24, 23-948 and Ariz.R.Civ.App.P. 23, 17 A.R.S.

II. ISSUE

We must decide if a physical injury…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Young v. DuncanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Royall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Zerofski's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Kelly's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Consolidated Freightways v. DrakeWyoming Supreme Court · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Circle K Store 1131 v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Rio Suite Hotel & Casino v. GorskyNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Fry's Food Stores v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Samaritan Health Services v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  5. Wood v. Safeway, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API