Legal Opinion

Fry's Food Stores v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1994No. CV-92-0435-PRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZLAKET, Justice.

The issue here is whether apportionment of workers’ compensation benefits pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-901.05 is appropriate where disability results from superimposition of an occupational disease upon a nonoccupational preexisting condition that did not, by itself, adversely affect claimant’s ability to perform his regular employment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.

On April 5, 1986, William Steele (“claimant”) fainted after becoming ill at work. He was a custodial worker who had cleaned up flour and dough at the central…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Morrison v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Murray v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Tatman v. Provincial HomesArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Maness v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1967

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Deschenes v. Transco, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Burton v. Rockwell InternationalSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. Barker v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
  4. Deschenes v. Transco, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. Parker v. Arizona Interscholastic Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API