Fry's Food Stores v. Industrial Commission
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZLAKET, Justice.
The issue here is whether apportionment of workers’ compensation benefits pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-901.05 is appropriate where disability results from superimposition of an occupational disease upon a nonoccupational preexisting condition that did not, by itself, adversely affect claimant’s ability to perform his regular employment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.
On April 5, 1986, William Steele (“claimant”) fainted after becoming ill at work. He was a custodial worker who had cleaned up flour and dough at the central…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Morrison v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Murray v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Tatman v. Provincial HomesArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Maness v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1967
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Deschenes v. Transco, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Burton v. Rockwell InternationalSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Barker v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
- Deschenes v. Transco, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Parker v. Arizona Interscholastic Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.