Zerofski's Case
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.
This appeal calls for interpretation of the phrase “personal injury arising out of and in the course of . . . employment,” as it appears in § 26 of our workers’ compensation act, G. L. c. 152, § 26, as amended through St. 1973, c. 855, § 1. We conclude that on the particular facts presented, the aggravation of the plaintiff’s prior injury, due to years of standing and walking at work, was not such a personal injury.
We summarize the facts as found by a single member of the Industrial Accident Board, and adopted by the reviewing board. The claimant, Walter A. Zerofski, was employed as a foreman…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Sponatski's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Caswell's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Hurle's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Maggelet's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Kelly's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Robinson v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Murphy v. Commissioner of the Department of Industrial AccidentsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Blanchette v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Robinson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.