Legal Opinion
Universal Oil Co. v. Root Rfg. Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 10, 1946No. 48 and 64PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
328 U.S. 575 (1946)
UNIVERSAL OIL PRODUCTS CO.
v.
ROOT REFINING CO.
Nos. 48 and 64.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 15, 1945.
Decided June 10, 1946.
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT.
Ralph S. Harris argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Robert T. McCracken, John R. McCullough and Frederick W.P. Lorenzen.
By special leave of Court, Thorley von Holst argued the cause pro se and for the Skelly Oil Company et al., as amici curiae, urging affirmance. With him on the brief were J. Bernhard Thiess, Sidney Neuman and Robert W. Poore.
2Opinion of the Court · FrankfurterJustice Frankfurter
Petitioner…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Winkler-Koch Engineering Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Pueblo ex rel. L.V.C.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1980
- NC-DSH, INC. v. GarnerNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Pueblo v. MéndezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947
- Diaz Mancilla v. Chesapeake Outdoor Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
- Martínez v. Superior Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.