Legal Opinion
Heinold Commodities, Inc. v. McCarty
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 7, 1979No. 78 C 2122PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DECKER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Heinold Commodities, Inc., and two of its brokers, filed this action for a declaratory judgment declaring that defendants Bob and Cecelia McCarty are not entitled to recover for losses in commodities trading. Defendants filed a six count counterclaim alleging that plaintiffs’ fraudulent actions constituted a violation of the Commodity Exchange Act and other laws. In Count IV, it is alleged that these actions violated the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act, and in Count V these same actions are alleged to have violated the federal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- United States v. Enrico Campanale and Donald Matthews, United States of America v. Mike GrancichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. MandelDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1976
- Farmers Bank of State of Del. v. Bell Mtg. Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1978
- Barr v. WUI/TAS, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Michael E. Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc., E. Jacques Courtois, Jr., Adrian Antoniu, and James M. Newman, Morgan Stanley Inc. And James M. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- SEDIMA, S.P.R.L., Appellant, v. IMREX COMPANY, INC., Gidon Armon and Jacob Armon, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Schacht v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Usaco Coal Company v. Carbomin Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- In Re Catanella and EF Hutton and Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.