Legal Opinion

United States v. Enrico Campanale and Donald Matthews, United States of America v. Mike Grancich

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 2, 1975No. 73-2643, 73-2833, 73-2747 and 73-2865PublishedCited by 217 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before CHAMBERS and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and KING, * District Judge. PER CURIAM:

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

A nine-count indictment returned on June 29, 1972, 1 in the United States Dis trict Court for the Central District of California charged appellants and three co-defendants 2 with conspiracy to conduct a pattern of racketeering activity (Counts 1 and 2) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), and with substantive offenses of requesting and receiving money in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 186 (Counts 3 and 4), obstructing and attempting to obstruct interstate commerce by extortion in…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by217 opinions

  1. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. Clarence E. Bennett v. Kenneth Berg, Dan R. Sandford, Jr. v. Kenneth BergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. John E. Kenny, Trenton P. Oelberg, and William L. Parker, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

212 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API