United States v. Enrico Campanale and Donald Matthews, United States of America v. Mike Grancich
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before CHAMBERS and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and KING, * District Judge. PER CURIAM:
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
A nine-count indictment returned on June 29, 1972, 1 in the United States Dis trict Court for the Central District of California charged appellants and three co-defendants 2 with conspiracy to conduct a pattern of racketeering activity (Counts 1 and 2) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), and with substantive offenses of requesting and receiving money in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 186 (Counts 3 and 4), obstructing and attempting to obstruct interstate commerce by extortion in…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by217 opinions
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Clarence E. Bennett v. Kenneth Berg, Dan R. Sandford, Jr. v. Kenneth BergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. John E. Kenny, Trenton P. Oelberg, and William L. Parker, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
212 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.