Legal Opinion

United States v. Mandel

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 31, 1976No. Crim. HM75-0822PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

HERBERT F. MURRAY, District Judge.

On November 24, 1975, the defendants in this case were indicted under 18 U.S.C. § 1341 on twenty counts of mail fraud and under 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq., on four counts of prohibited patterns of racketeering activity. The defendants have now moved to dismiss the indictment, arguing, inter alia, that the indictment fails to allege a cognizable scheme to defraud, that it is vague and fatally defective, that it is premised on erroneous and unconstitutional assumptions concerning the duties of the Governor of the State of Maryland, that the racketeering…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Clarence E. Bennett v. Kenneth Berg, Dan R. Sandford, Jr. v. Kenneth BergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. MandelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. ForsytheCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Lonnie M. Brown, Robert L. Newsome, James B. Finney, Julian E. Seymour, Jr., and Benjamin Clyde Cranford, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API