Legal Opinion
Barr v. WUI/TAS, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 26, 1975No. 74 Civ. 2687-LFMPublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MacMAHON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs move for (1) an order pursuant to Rule 15(a), Fed.R.Civ.P., amending the complaint; (2) a determination under Rule 23(c), Fed.R.Civ. P., that this is a class action; and (3) an order pursuant to Rule 37, Fed.R. Civ.P., compelling defendant to produce certain documents. Defendant moves, pursuant to Rule 12(c), Fed.R.Civ.P., for judgment on the pleadings.
The complaint alleges that defendant operates telephone answering services *112throughout the United States under various trade names and that the named plaintiffs have been subscribers to that service…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Nelson Radio & Supply Co., Inc. v. Motorola, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Michael E. Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc., E. Jacques Courtois, Jr., Adrian Antoniu, and James M. Newman, Morgan Stanley Inc. And James M. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Clarence E. Bennett v. Kenneth Berg, Dan R. Sandford, Jr. v. Kenneth BergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- SEDIMA, S.P.R.L., Appellant, v. IMREX COMPANY, INC., Gidon Armon and Jacob Armon, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Windham v. American Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.