Legal Opinion
National Ass'n of Mirror Manufacturers v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 15, 1987No. Court 87-04-00592PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DiCARLO, Judge:
The National Association of Mirror Manufacturers, plaintiff, and the United States, defendant, each move to strike the second and third sentences of paragraph 12 and the third request for relief contained in the answer of defendant-intervenor Glaverbel, S.A. Plaintiff and defendant argue that these portions of defendant-intervenor’s answer amount to an untimely cross-claim over which this Court does not have jurisdiction.
Since the claim raised by defendant-intervenor in its answer does not comport with the time limitations imposed by section 516A(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Georgetown Steel Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Washington Red Raspberry Commission v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- East Chilliwack Fruit Growers Co-Operative v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Fuji Elec. Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Union Steel v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Habas Sinai Ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal Endustrisi A.S. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.