Legal Opinion
Fuji Elec. Co., Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 2, 1984No. Court 83-7-00965PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum To Accompany Order
FORD, Judge.
Hitachi, Ltd. and Hitachi America Ltd., hereinafter referred to as Hitachi, has moved pursuant to Rule 24(a) of the Rules of this Court for leave to intervene as party plaintiffs and file a proposed complaint attached to its motion. The proposed intervenor urges it has an unconditional right to intervene under the provisions of Section 516(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, 19 U.S.C. § 1516(a) since it was an interested party who participated in the administrative proceeding.
Plaintiff, Westinghouse Electric…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chandler & Price Co. v. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
3Cited by13 opinions
- Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Freeport Minerals Company (Freeport-Mcmoran, Inc.) v. The United States, and Chevron Canada Resources Ltd. And Chevron Chemical Corp., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Washington Red Raspberry Commission v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- East Chilliwack Fruit Growers Co-Operative v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.