Legal Opinion

Washington Red Raspberry Commission v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 17, 1987No. Consolidated Court No. 85-06-00789PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion & Order

AQUILINO, Judge:

This consolidated case encompasses complaints by the plaintiff red raspberry growers, packers and associations (1) that the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“ITA”) unlawfully excluded the Abbotsford Growers’ Cooperative Union from its final affirmative determination of sales at less than fair value in Red Raspberries from Canada, 50 Fed.Reg. 19,768 (May 10,1985), and (2) that that determination contains erroneous weighted-average dumping margins.

The plaintiffs press some eight “methodological errors” 1 in support of their position…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Melamine Chemicals, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Georgetown Steel Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  3. Smith-Corona Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. East Chilliwack Fruit Growers Co-Operative v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  5. Fuji Elec. Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  2. Brother Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
  3. Micron Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
  4. Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
  5. Bomont Industries v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API