Legal Opinion
Eason v. Gould, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided February 7, 1984No. 8310SC115PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Claimant contends that the trial judge erred in concluding that claimant left her job voluntarily without good cause attributable to her employer, and was therefore ineligible for unemployment benefits under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 96-14(1) (1981).
Findings of fact made by the Employment Security Commission are binding on appeal where there is any competent evidence to support the findings. In re Cantrell, 44 N.C. App. 718, 263 S.E. 2d 1 (1980). Conclusions of law, however, may be fully reviewed on appeal.
An analysis of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 96-14(1) (1981) shows that an applicant will be…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Intercraft Industries Corp. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Labor & Industry Department v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Ferguson v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Matter of CantrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Watson v. Employment Security CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- In Re Poteat v. Employment Security Comm.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- White v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Carlson v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Bunn v. N. C. State UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.