Legal Opinion

Tarzia v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 17, 2000No. SC 16099PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

In this negligence action brought by the plaintiff, Nicholas Tarzia, against the defendant, *787Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, doing business as Waldbaum’s Food Market (Waldbaum’s), the plaintiff sought to recover damages for personal injuries he had sustained as a result of a slip and fall on some debris in Waldbaum’s parking lot. In January, 1994, Waldbaum’s impleaded its landlord, Samuel Heyman, as a third party defendant, claiming indemnification on the ground that pursuant to their lease, Heyman had the responsibility of keeping the parking lot reasonably free of debris. In…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tarzia v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  2. Tarzia v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Spears v. GarciaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. Isidro v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Mastrolillo v. City of DanburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Benvenuti Oil Co. v. Foss Consultants, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Saunders v. StigersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API