Legal Opinion
Mastrolillo v. City of Danbury
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 13, 2001No. AC 19879PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The plaintiff Janet Mastrolillo1 appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant city of Danbury (city). On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) abused its discretion in denying her request for leave to amend the complaint and (2) granted the city’s motion for summary judgment as to count one of the complaint. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our disposition of this appeal. As alleged in the complaint, on April 7, 1996, at…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Doty v. MucciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Gateway Co. v. DiNoiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Connecticut National Bank v. VoogSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- 2830 Whitney Avenue Corp. v. Heritage Canal Development Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Tryon v. Town of North BranfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Maloney v. PCRE, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Franc v. Bethel Holding Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Berlin Batting Cages, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Ramos v. Town of BranfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Flater v. GraceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.