Legal Opinion

Saunders v. Stigers

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 6, 2001No. AC 20408PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FOTI, J.

The defendant Elli Stigers1 appeals from the judgment of strict foreclosure, rendered by the trial court on December 20, 1999. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) rendered judgment, (2) granted the plaintiffs’2 motion to strike the defendant’s third special defense, (3) admitted evidence of the amount of the debt, and (4) found adequate notice of default and acceleration of the debt. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts are relevant to our resolution of this appeal. On March 28, 1994, the mortgage and note that are the subject…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Miller v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Amodio v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. Gateway Co. v. DiNoiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fidelity Bank v. KreniskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. Mulla v. MaguireConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Tang v. Bou-FakhreddineConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. Bank of America, FSB v. HanlonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Bank of America, N.A. v. ChainaniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API