Legal Opinion
Leach v. Hamilton Trucking Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided January 16, 2002No. 96,633PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
CAROL M. HANSEN, Chief Judge:
11 Petitioner, Richard Leach (Claimant), seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Court order denying his request that Respondents, Hamilton Trucking and Comp-source Oklahoma (collectively Employer), be required to repair or replace his hearing aids. We find the Workers' Compensation Court erred and vacate its order.
{2 In November 1992, the Workers' Compensation Court found Claimant had suffered compensable permanent partial binaural hearing loss. The court ordered that Employer "shall provide claimant with hearing aids." This was the sole finding in that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bill Hodges Truck Co. v. GillumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Special Indemnity Fund v. ChoateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Pitchford v. Jim Powell Dozer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Baxter v. Montgomery ExterminatingCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
- Bond v. Fox Building SupplySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lamson & Sessions v. DoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Hall v. Sheffield Steel Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
- Green v. Harsco Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
- Pham v. Wuu Jau Company Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006