Legal Opinion
Lamson & Sessions v. Doyle
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 12, 2002No. 96,594PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WATT, Vice Chief Justice:
¶ 1 Respondent, David Doyle (“Claimant”), petitioned this Court for certiorari review of the Court of Civil Appeals’ (“COCA”) opinion, reversing the order of the Workers’ Compensation Court on statute of limitations grounds. In support of his petition, Claimant has alleged the COCA decided questions of substance in a way which are probably not in accord with applicable decisions of this Court. Specifically, he alleges his Form 9, filed on March 8, 2001, was sufficient to give timely and adequate notice to Employer of his consequential injury to his bowel and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Booth & Flinn, Ltd. v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Special Indemnity Fund v. ChoateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Benning v. Pennwell Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Department of Public Safety v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sullivan v. Buckhorn Ranch PartnershipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Central State Community Service v. AndersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
- OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS, INC. v. MesserCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- Quail Ridge Senior Development, LLC v. BrooksCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014