Legal Opinion

Pitchford v. Jim Powell Dozer, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 22, 2000No. 92,261PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARGRAVE, V.C.J.

¶ 1 This matter concerns the denial of a post-award request by the claimant, James Pitchford for reimbursement of medications prescribed after the last disability hearing and order in a workers’ compensation matter. We find that the trial court correctly denied this request for reimbursement as claimant made no request for a finding of a change of condition subsequent to the last disability hearing and continuing medical maintenance was neither provided for nor reserved in the last disability order.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 Claimant was originally injured on January…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bill Hodges Truck Co. v. GillumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Orrick Stone Company v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. Depue v. Barsh Truck LinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  4. Douglas Aircraft Company v. TitsworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. City of Frederick v. ElmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. SHEPARD v. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  2. Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. CoburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  3. Jobe v. American Legion 7Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. Gratzer v. Happy FoodsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
  5. Leach v. Hamilton Trucking Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API