Legal Opinion
Pantazes v. Jackson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2005No. CIV.A. 04-1056(ESH)PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Peter Pantazes has brought suit against the Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) under the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794d (“the Act”), for failing to provide him with reasonable accommodations and accessible technology, and for harassing him because of his disability. Plaintiff claims that after returning to work following a stroke that left his vision impaired and diminished his short term memory, HUD took years to provide him with the accommodations recommended by both his doctors and the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Franklin v. PotterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Floyd v. Office of Representative Sheila Jackson LeeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Elzeneiny v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Long v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Hampton v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.