Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Adams

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1960No. Civ. 18827PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLINARI, J. pro tem. *

This is an appeal from a judgment discharging an alternative writ of mandamus and the denial of a petition for a peremptory writ of mandamus. The facts, as found by the trial court, are substantially as follows:

The appellant Jones is the owner of certain real property in the city of Monterey, and the appellant Hunter is the purchaser of said property pursuant to a written agreement of sale entered into on October 28, 1958. The said contract spe eifieally provided that the sale was conditioned upon the obtaining of a permit by Hunter for the erection of a motel on said…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Aaron v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. CEEED v. California Coastal Zone Conservation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Russian Hill Improvement Ass'n v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API