Legal Opinion

John Doe v. Gangland Productions, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 16, 2013No. 11-56325PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

Defendants’ documentary television series, Gangland, provides an inside glimpse into America’s most notorious street gangs. Plaintiff, a former prison gang member and police informant, has personal knowledge of certain high profile gangs. Plaintiff asserts that he agreed to be interviewed for an episode of Gangland on condition that his identity would be concealed in the broadcast. Defendants contend that Plaintiff knowingly signed a release that gave them the right to broadcast Plaintiffs identity.

When the Gangland episode aired, Plaintiffs identity was not…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Davidson v. City of WestminsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Greater Los Angeles Agency on Deafness, Inc. v. Cable News Network, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Hunter v. CBS Broadcasting Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Ham v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  4. Mullen v. Meredith Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Douglas Jordan-Benel v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API