Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. King

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided November 15, 1963No. 16,794PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Ferguson, Judge:

Convicted by general court-martial of two specifications of carnal knowledge, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 120, 10 USC § 920, the accused was sentenced to bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement at hard labor for one year, and reduction to the grade of Basic Airman. Intermediate appellate authorities aífirmed, and we granted accused’s petition for review upon the issue:

“Whether the instructions of the law officer as to compliance with Article 31 [10 USC § 831] were adequate and correct.”

A brief…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  2. United States v. GrishamUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. OdenwellerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  4. United States v. HolderUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  5. United States v. DoyleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. PennUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  3. United States v. BeckUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  4. United States v. SwiftUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  5. United States v. MurphyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API