Legal Opinion

Application of Julian Robert Anthony Beale

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 15, 1967No. Patent Appeal 7755PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 52-54 of application serial No. 676,563, filed August 6, 1957, originally entitled “Method of Manufacturing Semi-Conductor Devices.”

Appellant Beale copied the three appealed claims from Schwartz et al. patent (hereinafter “Schwartz”) No. 3,001,895 1 to provoke an interference. They stand rejected on the sole ground of lack of support in Beale’s specification. The examiner’s language was that the claims are “unwarranted by the disclosure.”

*971The single issue in this case presents a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Application of Oskar Sus and Werner SchaeferCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  2. Field v. StowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  3. Application of Carl W. WalterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  4. In re GemassmerUnited States Customs Court · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fontijn v. OkamotoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  2. Stamicarbon, N.V. v. Chemical Construction Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1975
  3. Application of Julian Robert Anthony BealeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  4. Skinner v. PacakCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API