Legal Opinion

Coeur D'Alene Tribe v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 18, 2011No. 06-940 LPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAMICH, Judge:

Plaintiff Coeur d’Alene Tribe (“Plaintiff’ or “Tribe”) filed this case on December 29, 2006, seeking damages for the United States’ alleged mismanagement of the Tribe’s trust funds and resources. On the same day, Plaintiff filed a similar case in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (“District Court”). In that case, Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that the United States breached its fiduciary trust obligations to Plaintiff and an order for a full historical equitable accounting of Plaintiffs trust assets. There is no question that, absent…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Rockwell International Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Mollan v. TorranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Halim v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  2. Kaw Nation of Oklahoma v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  3. United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API